In the case In re StubHub Refund Litigation, the primary issue revolved around the defendant, StubHub’s motion to modify the Electronically Stored Information.Read More
In the case Michelle Maziar v. City of Atlanta, Maziar, the former Director of the Atlanta Mayor's Office of Immigration Affairs, claimed wrongful.Read More
In the case of Traverse Therapy Services, PLLC v. Sadler-Bridges Wellness Group, PLLC, James Boulding-Bridges, and Haley Campbell (CASE NO. C23-1239 MJP), the.Read More
In The Trade Group, Inc. v. BTC Media, LLC, et al., the dispute centers around a breach of contract related to the organization.Read More
In the case Amimon Inc. v. Shenzhen Hollyland Tech Co., the court dealt with issues related to the enforcement of a protective order.Read More
In the case Two Canoes LLC v. Addian Inc., the District of New Jersey addressed issues regarding the alleged spoliation of evidence, particularly.Read More
A recent decision declined to find the requisite “intent to deprive” that would merit sanctions under Rule 37(e) when a plaintiff was unable.Read More
Chief Judge James K. Bredar of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland found that a party was required to review.Read More
In a recent contract dispute, the court held that relevancy redactions were allowable even though a protective order was in place – provided.Read More
Generative AI tools such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Bard have dominated headlines for months as people consider the possibilities and pitfalls of.Read More
