In Miller v. Regions Bank, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama imposed significant sanctions on an attorney who submitted.Read More
In Withers v. City of Aberdeen, the Northern District of Mississippi imposed sanctions on all four attorneys of record after discovering that three.Read More
In Central Valley Eden Environmental Defenders, LLC v. Sweetener Products, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California addressed the.Read More
In Alexa v. City of Ann Arbor, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan addressed multiple discovery disputes arising from.Read More
Stay Discovery Denied: Court Compels 62,000-Document ESI Production in Star Auto Sales v. Rosenfield
In Star Auto Sales of Bayside, Inc. v. Rosenfield & Co., the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida addressed motions.Read More
In Nelson v. Curtiss Wright Electro Mechanical Corp., the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina addressed significant Rule 37 sanctions.Read More
In CMPC USA, Inc. v. GWSI, Inc., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania addressed a series of late-stage discovery.Read More
Third-party vendor discovery obligations are continuing to come into sharper focus as courts clarify what parties must do when key information sits with.Read More
In McCarthy v. DEA, the Third Circuit issued a precedential opinion reprimanding an attorney for submitting briefs that relied on unverified, AI-generated legal.Read More
In Davis v. Safety Holdings, Inc. (D. Md. 2026), the court reinforced the heightened protections afforded to non-parties in discovery, granting Lyft’s motion.Read More
